A former Societe Generale trader, Kavish Kataria, who was dismissed from the bank’s Delta One desk last year, has come forward to criticize the French bank for what he perceives as unfair treatment. He claims that he was made a “scapegoat” by the bank and that they failed to take their share of responsibility for missed trades. According to Kataria, the profits and losses on his trades were reported daily to his superiors in Hong Kong and Paris, with emails sent out detailing the transactions. Despite this, he was still dismissed from his position.
Responsibility and Accountability
Kataria’s main grievance seems to be with the lack of responsibility taken by Societe Generale for the oversight of the trades. He argues that instead of acknowledging a failure in their risk system to identify the trades in a timely manner, they chose to blame him and terminate his contract. In a LinkedIn post, he expressed his frustration with the situation, stating that the bank’s actions were unfair and unjust. He highlighted the fact that the trades were auto-booked and that daily emails were sent out to the entire group confirming that the trades had been reconciled.
Following his dismissal, Kataria called for better regulation within the trading industry to ensure fairness and accountability for traders. He claimed to have made significant profits for the bank during his time there, yet he was still let go with only seven days’ salary and his previous year’s bonus withheld. His criticism of the lack of rules and regulations to protect traders’ rights highlights a broader issue within the industry.
The incident involving Kataria is not the first time Societe Generale has faced issues related to trading activities. The French bank previously suffered significant losses in 2008 due to a “rogue trader” on the same derivatives desk as Kataria. This history adds a layer of complexity to the current situation, as the bank remains under scrutiny for its risk management practices. Despite avoiding financial losses in this particular case, the potential for severe consequences had there been a market downturn raises questions about the effectiveness of the bank’s risk controls.
While Societe Generale claims that the incident involving Kataria did not result in any financial losses for the bank, the possibility of losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars loomed large. The internal review that led to Kataria and his team head Kevin Ng’s dismissal suggests that the bank takes such matters seriously. However, Kataria’s allegations of unfair treatment and lack of accountability within the bank paint a different picture of the internal dynamics at Societe Generale.
The case of Kavish Kataria sheds light on the complexities of risk management and accountability within financial institutions. His accusations against Societe Generale raise important questions about fairness, regulation, and responsibility in the trading industry. As the bank navigates through these issues, it will be crucial to address the concerns raised by Kataria and ensure transparency and accountability in future dealings.
Leave a Reply